Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Donald L. Robertson Trust v. Brigham Young University
as 20-4061
Cross Claimant:
DONALD L. ROBERTSON TRUST
Defendant:
WEILIN XIE and DANIEL L. SIMMONS
Not Yet Classified:
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff:
BEUS GILBERT PLLC
Beus Gilbert v. Brigham Young University, et al
as 19-4026
Undetermined:
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY and DONALD L. ROBERTSON TRUST
Defendant:
WEILIN XIE and DANIEL L. SIMMONS
Plaintiff:
BEUS GILBERT PLLC
Simmons v. Social Security Administration
as 0:2018cv62263
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Simmons v. United States of America, The
as 2:2016cv02378
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Simmons, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Robertson et al
as 2:2014cv00206
Plaintiff:
Beus Gilbert PLLC
Defendant:
Donald Robertson, Brigham Young University, Weilin Xie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Covington v. Care For All Homemaker and Companion Service Inc. et al
as 0:2013cv62400
Plaintiff:
Danielle Covington
Defendant:
Care For All Homemaker and Companion Service Inc. and Daniel L. Simmons
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Brigham Young University et al
as 2:2012cv00970
Plaintiff:
Beus Gilbert PLLC
Defendant:
Brigham Young University, Weilin Xie and Daniel L. Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Brigham Young University et al v. Pfizer et al
as 2:2012mc00143
Plaintiff:
Brigham Young University and Daniel L. Simmons
Defendant:
Pfizer , GD Searle & Co , GD Searle LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Brigham Young University et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 5:2012cv00041
Plaintiff:
Brigham Young University and Daniel L Simmons
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, GD Searle & Company, GD Searle LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
