City of Deerfield Beach, Florida v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
City of Deerfield Beach, Florida |
CVS VERO FLORIDA DISTRIBUTION, L.L.C., McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC, Insys Therapeutics, Inc., Wal-Mart Inc., ALLERGAN PLC, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., ACTAVIS LLC, Cardinal Health, Inc., Health Mart Systems, Inc., Allergan Finance LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Walgreen Co., Cephalon, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., CVS Orlando, Florida Distribution, L.L.C., THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Specgx LLC, Noramco, Inc., H. D. Smith, LLC, ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Purdue Pharma Inc. and JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS |
0:2018cv63076 |
December 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Cecilia M Altonaga |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. Case transferred from Florida Southern has been opened in Northern District of Ohio as case 1:19-op-45021, filed 01/22/2019. (bb) |
Filing 6 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-75) transferring case to the Northern District of Ohio re: MDL 2804 for consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 USC 1407 and assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Polster. (Signed by Jeffery N. Luthi, Clerk of the Panel). (mc) |
Civil Case Terminated per DE #6 Conditional Transfer Order. Closing Case. (mc) |
SYSTEM ENTRY - Case 0:18-cv-63076 electronically transferred out to Ohio Northern. (mc) |
Filing 5 ORDER that on or before March 17, 2019, Plaintiff shall perfect service upon the Defendants or show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to perfect service of process. Failure to file proof of service or show good cause by March 17 will result in a dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 1/4/2019. See attached document for full details. (wc) |
Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Attorney information does not match initiating document. The name of the attorney submitting the complaint does not match the signature on the pdf document. The attorney listed on the initiating document has been added. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (pcs) |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Party(ies) Improperly Formatted. The Filer failed to enter the party name(s) alias in accordance with the CM/ECF Format for Adding Parties for Attorneys Guide. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file the document. (pcs) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (pcs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11247985, filed by City of Deerfield Beach, Florida. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gilbert, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.