Axos Bank v. Chowdhury et al
| Axos Bank |
| Danielle Mara Chowdhury, Unknown Tenant in Possession of the Mortgaged Property, Eqramul I. Chowdhury and United States Of America |
| 0:2020cv62342 |
| November 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Transmittal Letter Sent with Order of Remand to: 17th Judicial Circuit Court. State Court Case Number: CACE-20-013010 (11) (kpe) |
Filing 12
ORDER of Remand. Order granting #9 Motion to Remand and for Attorneys' Fees and Costs. This matter is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 1/12/2021. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 11 Plaintiff's Election to Jurisdiction for Final Disposition of Motions . Filed by Axos Bank (Gerber, Michelle) |
| Filing 10 Plaintiff's SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Axos Bank (Gerber, Michelle) |
| Filing 9 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand and for Attorneys' Fees and Costs and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Axos Bank. (Gerber, Michelle) |
| Filing 8 Plaintiff's Corporate Disclosure Statement and Certificate of Interested Parties by Axos Bank identifying Corporate Parent Axos Financial, Inc. for Axos Bank (Gerber, Michelle) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Counsel re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by Michelle Lauren Gerber on behalf of Axos Bank (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit) (Gerber, Michelle) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Compliance by Axos Bank re #5 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report, (Gerber, Michelle) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Requiring Joint Scheduling Report, Certificates Of Interested Parties And Corporate Disclosure Statements. Joint Scheduling Report, Certificates Of Interested Parties And Corporate Disclosure Statements due by 12/28/2020. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 11/23/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Parties Not Added. The Filer failed to add all parties associated with the case. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (kpe) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Verified Complaint for Foreclosure) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13884785, filed by Danielle Mara Chowdhury, Eqramul I. Chowdhury. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Summon(s) Summons, #3 Other Paper Original Documents)(Marrero, Julio) No answer/motion to dismiss filed. Modified text on 11/18/2020 (kpe). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
