Keller v. Pichardo et al
| Peter Francies Keller |
| O. Urbina, N. Finisse, Gisula Pichardo, Simo and Balmir |
| 1:2008cv21472 |
| June 6, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Miami Office |
| Miami-Dade |
| Ursula Ungaro |
| Patrick A. White |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
194
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendations re 192 Report and Recommendations. denying 98 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 140 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 160 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 172 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 7/30/2009. (ail)
|
|
Filing
192
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on 42 USC 1983 case re 172 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof filed by Balmir, 98 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Peter Francies Keller, 140 MOTION for Summary Judgment & Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof filed by O. Urbina, 160 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by N. Finisse, Gisula Pichardo recommending that the plaintiff's and defendants' pending motions for summary judgment (DE #s98, 140, 160 and 172) be dismissed, without prejudice, to renew after the plaintiff supplements the record with lumbar spine MRI results on or before September 1, 2009; and that the plaintiff and defendants be allowed to refile their prior mot ions for summary judgment, by filing notices of renewal, incorporating their prior motions and exhibits by reference if they choose; and that with regard to such new medical evidence as the plaintiff may submit based on his January 2009 lumbar spine MRI scans, the parties (defendants and plaintiff) be permitted to submit supplemental arguments in addition to renewal of their prior summary judgment motions. Objections to R&R due by 7/20/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick A. White on 7/1/2009. (lr)
|
|
Filing
181
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendations re 93 Report and Recommendations. denying 53 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order; denying 53 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 87 Motion for Preliminary Injunction;. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 5/11/2009. (ail)
|
|
Filing
175
ORDER Affirming Report and Recommendations re 152 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge Adalberto Jordan on 4/27/2009. (ail)
|
|
Filing
152
REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO FURTHER SUPPLEMENTAL HIS AMENDED PLEADINGS. Recommending 1) plaintiffs motion(DE#131) for leave to file a proposed Final Supplement to Complaint be DENIED, without prejudice to pursue any new claims which he may wish to raise in a separate lawsuit; and 2) this case, which has reached the stage of summary judgment, be allowed to proceed on claims against the ECI defendants Pichardo, Urbina,Finisse and Balmir, on claims raised in plaintiff Kellers complaint (DE#1), as previously amended (DE#s 11, 13, 14 and 18)and supplemented (DE#s 54 and 86). Objections to R&R due by 4/2/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick A. White on 3/13/2009. (tw)
|
|
Filing
93
REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 87 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Peter Francies Keller and 53 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Peter Francies Keller. Recommending denying. Objections to R&R due by 1/26/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick A. White on 1/7/2009. (tw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
