Cases 1 - 10 of 172
Aurel v. Jessup Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2024cv01352
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Jessup Correctional Institution, Dr. Khalid El-Bedavei, MD, Dr. Muleta Obsu, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Simo et al
as 1:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia derivatively on behalf of MAPLEBEAR INC. d/b/a Instacart
Defendant:
Fidji Simo, Nick Giovanni, Alan Ramsay and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Stephens v. Maplebear Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Andy Dean Stephens
Defendant:
Maplebear Inc. d/b/a Instacart, Fidji Simo, Nick Giovanni and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Simoes v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv01594
Plaintiff:
Alonna Jean Simoes
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brightwell v. Kasahun et al
as 1:2023cv03189
Plaintiff:
David Brightwell
Defendant:
Temesgen MD Kasahun, JCI Hospital Administrator, Agonafir MD Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
SIMOES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33804
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS SIMOES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. HireRight, et al
as 23-5092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
HIRERIGHT, LLC and TODD SIMO, M.D.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
