Machuca v. Target Corporation et al
Rosa Machuca |
Michelle Lozier and Target Corporation |
1:2019cv21262 |
April 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Edwin G Torres |
Kathleen M Williams |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT as to #7 Transmittal Letter Sent, #6 Order Remanding Case to State Court. (kpe) |
Filing 9 SECOND Clerk's Notice of Undeliverable Mail re #7 Transmittal Letter Sent, #6 Order Remanding Case to State Court,. US Mail returned for: Jose Antonio Negroni. Updated address found and document resent to new address. Negroni Law Group, LLC7050 NW 4th St Ste 201Plantation, FL 33317-2247 (mp) |
Filing 8 FIRST Clerk's Notice of Undeliverable Mail re #3 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other. US Mail returned for: Jose Antonio Negroni. Updated address found and document resent to new address. Negroni Law Group, LLC7050 NW 4th St Ste 201Plantation, FL 33317-2247 (mp) |
Filing 7 Transmittal Letter Sent with Order Remanding Case to: 11th Judicial Circuit Court. State Court Case Number: 19-003981-CA-01 (kpe) |
Filing 6 ORDER REMANDING CASE. This action is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida. Any and all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 4/22/2019. See attached document for full details. (kpe) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION FOR REMAND by Target Corporation (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR REMAND)(Libman, Shawn) |
Filing 4 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),, by Michelle Lozier. Attorney Shawn Y. Libman added to party Michelle Lozier (pty:dft). Responses due by 4/22/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Affidavit of Michelle Lozier)(Libman, Shawn) |
Filing 3 ORDER OF REFERRAL AND NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE IN REMOVAL CASES. (Removal Status Report due by 4/18/2019.) Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 4/4/2019. See attached document for full details. (kpe) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Amended Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11531264, filed by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Target's Certificate of Status, #4 Exhibit C - Target's Annual Report, #5 Exhibit D - Affidavit of Target's Senior Corporate Counsel, #6 Exhibit E - Affidavit of Michelle Lozier, #7 Exhibit F - Rawlings Letter, #8 Exhibit G - All Other State Court Pleadings (Answer and initial Complaint))(Libman, Shawn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.