Sindhu v. United States Of America
| Shafqat Sindhu |
| United States Of America |
| 1:2021cv22687 |
| July 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Marcia G Cooke |
| John J O'Sullivan |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Clerks Notice to Filer re #8 Certificate of Service,. Wrong Event Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. The document was re-docketed by the Clerk, see de# 9 Summons Returned Executed as to USA. It is not necessary to refile this document. (mee) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Shafqat Sindhu. United States Of America served on 7/30/2021, answer due 9/28/2021. For image see d.e. #8 . Modified text on 8/10/2021 (mee). |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Shafqat Sindhu re #6 Summons Issued as to USA (Kellam, Christopher) |
Filing 7
ORDER OF REFERRAL AND ORDER REGARDING COURT PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 7/29/2021. See attached document for full details. (lbc)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to United States Of America(mee) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Shafqat Sindhu re #1 Complaint filed by Shafqat Sindhu (Kellam, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Shafqat Sindhu re #1 Complaint of Filing Civil Cover Sheet (Kellam, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (mee) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shafqat Sindhu. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14875063, filed by Shafqat Sindhu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT A, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT B)(Kellam, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sindhu v. United States Of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shafqat Sindhu | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Wade Kellam |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
