Miranda v. United States Of America
Plaintiff: Mr. Jorge Miranda and Jorge F. Miranda
Defendant: United States Of America
Case Number: 1:2022cv22174
Filed: July 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: James Lawrence King
Nature of Suit: Taxes
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 6703 IRS: Refund of Tax Penalty
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Forrest T. Young on behalf of United States Of America. Attorney Forrest T. Young added to party United States Of America(pty:dft). (Young, Forrest)
July 21, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY by Jorge F. Miranda for dates of August 2, 2022 through August 6, 2022 (Garcia, Senen)
July 20, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE by Jorge F. Miranda Amended Civil Cover Sheet (Garcia, Senen)
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Estimated Length of Trial re #1 Complaint, filed by Jorge F. Miranda Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 7/19/2022. See attached document for full details. (jw)
July 15, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United States Of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (bb)
July 14, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James Lawrence King. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Melissa Damian is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (bb)
July 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT JORGE F MIRANDA against United States Of America. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15791815, filed by Jorge Miranda. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s) Summons to the US Attorney General, #2 Summon(s) Summons to the US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, #3 Summon(s) Summons to the Internal Revenue Service, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Garcia, Senen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miranda v. United States Of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mr. Jorge Miranda
Represented By: Senen Daniel Garcia, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jorge F. Miranda
Represented By: Senen Daniel Garcia, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Of America
Represented By: Forrest T. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?