CAROL BUSINESS CORP v. United States Of America
| CAROL BUSINESS CORP |
| United States Of America |
| 1:2022cv22476 |
| August 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Roy K Altman |
| Lisette M Reid |
| Tax Suits: IRS-Third Party |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Clerk shall CLOSE the case. All pending deadlines are TERMINATED, and any pending motions are DENIED as moot. Closing Case. (With Prejudice) Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 9/9/2022. See attached document for full details. (scn)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by CAROL BUSINESS CORP (Hudicourt, Michelle) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER re Consolidation. Case Number 22-cv-22478-RKA shall be administratively CLOSED. All future filings shall be made under Carol Business Corp. v. United States of America, No. 22-cv-22476-RKA. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 8/25/2022. See attached document for full details. (swr)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings re DE#7 . The Plaintiffs shall file a single, combined petition, which will govern this case by 9/12/2022. (swr) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by CAROL BUSINESS CORP re #4 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions Filing Corrected Certificate of Service (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Rodriguez, Cristina) |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by CAROL BUSINESS CORP (Rodriguez, Cristina) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by CAROL BUSINESS CORP (Rodriguez, Cristina) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United States Of America, U.S. Attorney General. (scn) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (scn) |
| Filing 1 PETITION (Complaint) to Quash IRS Summons . Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15849820, filed by CAROL BUSINESS CORP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Summon(s) Summons, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Rodriguez, Cristina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CAROL BUSINESS CORP v. United States Of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: CAROL BUSINESS CORP | |
| Represented By: | Cristina Boullon Rodriguez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States Of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
