Garrison et al v. Singh
Edwin Garrison, Gregg Podalsky, Skyler Lindeen, Alexander Chernyavsky, Sunil Kavuri, Gary Gallant and David Nicol |
Jaspreet Singh |
1:2023cv23046 |
August 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
K Michael Moore |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER REINSTATING STAY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-2) re: MDL 3076 and 23-cv-23046 in the Southern District of Florida and 23-cv-11764 in the Eastern District of Michigan. (Signed by Tiffaney D. Pete, Clerk of the Panel) (jas) |
Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER STAYING CASE. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon a sua sponte review of the record. The Court notes that this case is a member case in In Re: FTX Cryptocurrency Exchange Collapse Litigation, 1:23-md-03076-KMM. In the interests of judicial economy, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is STAYED. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to administratively close this case for statistical purposes, while the claims proceed under 1:23-md-03076-KMM. The Court shall retain jurisdiction and the case shall be restored to the active docket upon motion of a party if circumstances change so that the action may proceed to final disposition. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 8/11/2023. (rfr) (jas) |
Filing 10 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge K. Michael Moore. (jas) |
Filing 9 Case transferred in from Michigan Eastern; Case Number 2:23-cv-11764. Electronic file including transfer order and docket sheet received. .(jas). |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Transfer to the Southern District of Florida for MDL 3076 (SSch) |
Filing 7 MDL Certified Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-2) to Southern District of Florida for MDL # 3076. (SSch) |
Filing 6 MDL Certified Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-2) for MDL # 3076. [Informational Copy] (SSch) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael O. Cummings on behalf of Jaspreet Singh. (Cummings, Michael) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald G. Acho on behalf of Jaspreet Singh. (Acho, Ronald) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Jaspreet Singh* (DPer) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Sharon S. Almonrode appearing on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Almonrode, Sharon) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against Jaspreet Singh with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9427023 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Out of State - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, 1:23-md-03076-KMM, Judge K. Michael Moore] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - In re: FTX Cryptocurrency Exchange Collapse Litigation, MDL No. 3076, ECF No. 138 (J.P.M.L June 5, 2023), #2 Exhibit B - Expert Report of Paul Sibenik (December 16, 2022)) (Miller, E.) |
Filing 13 Initial Scheduling and Case Management Order. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 6/21/2023. See attached document for full details. (jas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.