McGill v. United States Attorney General et al
Rodney Maurice McGill, Sr. |
United States Attorney General and The Department of Justice |
1:2023cv24916 |
December 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Robin L Rosenberg |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING AND CLOSING CASE. It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Complaint is DISMISSED and the Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE THIS CASE and DENY all other pending motions AS MOOT. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 2/8/2024. See attached document for full details. (rbe) |
Filing 6 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Written order to follow. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg (bkd) |
Filing 5 Clerk's Notice of Filing Deficiency. Civil Cover Sheet not filed pursuant to Local Rule 3.3. (jas) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons by Rodney Maurice McGill, Sr.. (jas) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rodney Maurice McGill, Sr.. (jas) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg. (jas) |
Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against United States Attorney General. Filing fee $405.00. IFP Filed, filed by Rodney Maurice McGill, Sr.. (jas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.