Veliz Monroy v. Noem et al
| Yarielis Veliz Monroy |
| Kristi Noem, Joseph B. Edlow, Todd M. Lyons, Pete R. Flores, Matthew S. Davies and Robert Hammer |
| 1:2025cv23498 |
| August 5, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Enjolique A Lett |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction #1 Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Mandamus,, MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Yarielis Veliz Monroy. Replies due by 12/8/2025. (Soto, Eduardo) |
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (DE #8 ). Upon review of the Motion, and because it is unopposed, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion (DE #8 ) is GRANTED. The Court expects the Parties to strictly adhere to deadlines moving forward. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 11/20/2025. (ymd)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File late answer and for extension of time by Yarielis Veliz Monroy. Responses due by 12/4/2025. (Soto, Eduardo) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction #1 Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Mandamus,, ( Responses due by 11/17/2025.), MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Matthew S. Davies, Joseph B. Edlow, Pete R. Flores, Robert Hammer, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem. (Diaz, Natalie) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Striking #5 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions,, filed by Kristi Noem, Joseph B. Edlow, Matthew S. Davies, Todd M. Lyons, Pete R. Flores, Robert Hammer by Matthew S. Davies, Joseph B. Edlow, Pete R. Flores, Robert Hammer, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem (Diaz, Natalie) |
| Filing 5 STRICKEN per DE #6 . Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Matthew S. Davies, Joseph B. Edlow, Pete R. Flores, Robert Hammer, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem. Attorney Natalie Diaz added to party Matthew S. Davies(pty:dft), Attorney Natalie Diaz added to party Joseph B. Edlow(pty:dft), Attorney Natalie Diaz added to party Pete R. Flores(pty:dft), Attorney Natalie Diaz added to party Robert Hammer(pty:dft), Attorney Natalie Diaz added to party Todd M. Lyons(pty:dft), Attorney Natalie Diaz added to party Kristi Noem(pty:dft). (Diaz, Natalie) Modified on 11/4/2025 (pcs). |
Filing 4
ORDER OF REFERRAL AND NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES. REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Enjolique A. Lett for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 8/11/2025. See attached document for full details. (gqa)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Matthew S. Davies, Joseph B. Edlow, Pete R. Flores, Robert Hammer, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (gqa) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. (gqa) |
| Filing 1 Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Mandamus against All Defendants. Filing fee $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-18676860, filed by Yarielis Veliz Monroy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Summon(s), #8 Summon(s), #9 Summon(s), #10 Summon(s), #11 Summon(s), #12 Summon(s), #13 Summon(s), #14 Summon(s))Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Soto, Eduardo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.