Scott v. Williams et al
| Michael Scott |
| Brian Williams, Brian Williams Jr, Ronald Williams, Ronald Williams Jr, Michael Williams, Michael Williams 1st, Michael Williams 2nd, Michael Williams 3rd, Michael Williams 4th, Michael Williams 5th, Michael Williams 6th, Michael Williams 7th, Michael Williams 8th, Michael Williams 9th, Michael Williams 10th, Michael Williams 11th, Michael Williams 12th, Michael Williams 13th, Michael Williams 14th, Cash Money Records and Universal Records |
| 1:2025cv25215 |
| November 7, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Lisette M Reid |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 0101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ECF No. #3 . Plaintiff shall file a signed Amended Complaint in accordance with this Order by May 4, 2026. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action without further notice. Case is CLOSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 4/2/2026. See attached document for full details. (blc)
|
| Filing 9 Clerk's Notice of Filing Deficiency Re: #8 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal,, filed by Michael Scott. Document(s) missing required signature(s) (Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(a)). (blc) |
| Filing 8 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Brian Williams, Michael Williams, Ronald Williams, Michael Williams 10th, Michael Williams 11th, Michael Williams 12th, Michael Williams 13th, Michael Williams 14th, Michael Williams 1st, Michael Williams 2nd, Michael Williams 3rd, Michael Williams 4th, Michael Williams 5th, Michael Williams 6th, Michael Williams 7th, Michael Williams 8th, Michael Williams 9th, Brian Williams Jr, Ronald Williams Jr, filed by Michael Scott. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(blc) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Brian Williams, Ronald Williams, Cash Money Records, Universal Records, filed by Michael Scott. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(blc) |
Filing 6
ORDER REGARDING JURISDICTION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 11/13/2025. See attached document for full details. (blc)
|
Filing 5
ORDER PROVIDING INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 11/13/2025. See attached document for full details. (blc)
|
| Filing 4 FORM AO 121 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (blc) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Scott. (blc) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (blc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael Williams 6th, Michael Williams 13th, Brian Williams, Michael Williams, Ronald Williams, Michael Williams 10th, Michael Williams 11th, Michael Williams 12th, Michael Williams 14th, Michael Williams 1st, Michael Williams 2nd, Michael Williams 3rd, Michael Williams 4th, Michael Williams 5th, Michael Williams 7th, Michael Williams 8th, Michael Williams 9th, Brian Williams Jr, Ronald Williams Jr. Filing fees $ 405.00 Not Paid. IFP Filed, filed by Michael Scott. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(blc). Modified text on 11/10/2025 (blc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.