Teel v. Lozada et al
| Dudley Teel |
| Sheriff Deryl Loar and Deputy Sheriff Jonathan Lozada |
| 2:2018cv14367 |
| September 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Shaniek M Maynard |
| Donald M Middlebrooks |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (cbr) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks and Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cbr) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Deryl Loar, Jonathan Lozada. Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-10979345, filed by Dudley Teel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Sheriff Loar, #3 Summon(s) Deputy Lozada, #4 Exhibit A)(Rubin, Guy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
