Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Holmes v. Indian River Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2023cv14287
Plaintiff:
Ryan Jeffrey Holmes
Defendant:
Indian River Sheriff Office, Sheriff Deryl Loar, Deputy Christian Mathisen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Campbell et al
as 2:2023cv14066
Plaintiff:
Ryan Jeffrey Holmes
Defendant:
Captain Kent Campbell, Sergeant Christian Mathisen and Sheriff Deryl Loar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Loar et al
as 2:2021cv14275
Plaintiff:
Gentrus Thomas, Sr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Deryl Loar, Indian River County Sheriff Department, Brandon Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Loar et al
as 2:2021cv14184
Defendant:
Sheriff Deryl Loar, Andrew Dean and Michael Scott
Plaintiff:
Charles Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowry v. Indian River County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2021cv14159
Defendant:
Tim Crooker, Ruben Bermudez, Sheriff Deryl Loar and others
Plaintiff:
Leslie Lowry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Deffendall v. Loar et al
as 2:2021cv14160
Defendant:
Officer Matthew Bryant, Major Shelby Strickland, Sheriff Deryl Loar and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Deffendall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffee IV v. Indian River County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2021cv14154
Defendant:
Sheriff Deryl Loar, Indian River County Sheriff's Department, Rick Sarcinello and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Coffee IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
King v. Loar et al
as 2:2020cv14350
Defendant:
Sheriff Deryl Loar and Bryan Ballash
Plaintiff:
Derrick King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kenyon v. Loar et al
as 2:2020cv14309
Plaintiff:
Ward Lawrence Kenyon
Defendant:
Sheriff Deryl Loar, Selby Strickland and James Hare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teel v. Lozada et al
as 2:2018cv14367
Defendant:
Sheriff Deryl Loar and Deputy Sheriff Jonathan Lozada
Plaintiff:
Dudley Teel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
