Collazo v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Pedro Collazo
Defendant: United States Of America
Case Number: 2:2021cv14056
Filed: February 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Shaniek M Maynard
Referring Judge: Donald M Middlebrooks
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1402
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2021 Filing 13 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by United States Of America. Attorney Lawrence Nathan Rosen added to party United States Of America(pty:dft). (Rosen, Lawrence)
April 2, 2021 Filing 12 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Pedro Collazo. United States Of America served on 2/4/2021, answer due 4/5/2021. (Moore, Charles)
April 2, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE of Striking Document #6 by Pedro Collazo (Moore, Charles)
April 2, 2021 Filing 10 Clerks Notice to Filer re #6 Acknowledgment of Service. Wrong Event Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. The correct event is Summons (Affidavit) Returned Executed as to USA DFTS.; CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED - Filer must file a Notice of Striking, then refile the document using the correct event. (ls)
April 2, 2021 Filing 9 Clerks Notice to Filer re #7 Report Regarding. Wrong Event Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. The document was re-docketed by the Clerk, see [de#8]. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls)
April 1, 2021 Filing 8 JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Pedro Collazo, United States Of America (ls)(See Image at DE #7)
April 1, 2021 Filing 7 REPORT REGARDING Local Rule 16.1(B) Joint Conference Report by Pedro Collazo (Moore, Charles)
April 1, 2021 Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE filed by Pedro Collazo. (Moore, Charles)
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PAPERLESS Order setting the telephonic Scheduling Conference for THURSDAY, APRIL 8, 2021 at 1:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard. Counsel shall call the Court's telephone conference line number at (888) 684-8852 and use Access Code 5312437 to participate in the Conference. Pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(b), counsel for the parties shall confer and prepare a Joint Scheduling Report based on the already set trial date. The Joint Scheduling Report is due by MONDAY, APRIL 5, 2021. The parties shall begin pre-trial tasks now, in advance of the Scheduling Conference. This includes Initial Disclosures (which the parties shall exchange before the Scheduling Conference) and discovery. In other words the case already should be progressing by the time of the Scheduling Conference, and the Joint Scheduling Report should reflect that. This is necessary so that the parties can complete all pre-trial tasks within the time allotted and have the case ready for trial by the soon upcoming trial date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard on 3/10/2021. (ggr)
February 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE AND SETTING TRIAL DATE: Jury Trial set for 11/29/2021 9:00 AM in Fort Pierce Division before Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks., Calendar Call set for 11/24/2021 1:15 PM in West Palm Beach Division before Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard to conduce a Scheduling Conference. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 2/18/2021. See attached document for full details. (scn) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
February 3, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United States Of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (scn)
February 3, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (scn)
February 3, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against united states of america. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14330126, filed by Pedro Collazo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s))(Yanchunis, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Collazo v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pedro Collazo
Represented By: John Allen Yanchunis, Sr.
Represented By: Charles Travis Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Of America
Represented By: Lawrence Nathan Rosen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?