Cadejuste v. Wellpath Medical Company et al
| Gieuvois Cadejuste |
| Wellpath Medical Company, Hayes, Ferlane, Amark Canteen, Food Service Owners, Lyons, Globletel Link, Chief Public Defender, Diamond Litty and U.S. Dept. of Treasury |
| 2:2023cv14058 |
| March 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robin L Rosenberg |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT. Plaintiff's Complaint [DE 1] is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis [DE #3 ] is DENIED pursuant to the three strikes provision of Section 1915(g). The Clerk of Court is ordered to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 3/7/2023. See attached document for full details. (daa)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gieuvois Cadejuste. (daa) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg. (daa) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Amark Canteen, Chief Public Defender, Ferlane, Food Service Owners, Globletel Link, Hayes, Diamond Litty, Lyons, U.S. Dept. of Treasury, Wellpath Medical Company. Filing fee $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Gieuvois Cadejuste. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
