Denney v. Nelson et al
| Michael David Denney |
| Cynthia Nelson and John Does |
| 1:2006cv00172 |
| February 1, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition Office |
| Mitchell |
| Richard L. Hodge |
| W. Louis Sands |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
ORDER finding as moot 76 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 83 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommendations re 91 Report and Recommendations. Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 3/30/2011. (bcl)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER denying 47 Motion for TRO; denying 55 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommendations re 65 Report and Recommendations.Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 2/24/2010 (bcl)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION: Recommendations re 55 MOTION to Dismiss or in the Alternative, Motion to Compel and for Sanctions and Extension of Discovery filed by Cynthia Nelson and 47 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Michael David Denney; Order declining to impose sanctions and compelling deposition of plaintiff, with discovery being reopened for 45 days. Ordered by U.S. Mag Judge Claude W. Hicks, Jr. on 1/20/10. (CWH)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER granting 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and directing that plaintiff supplement his complaint . Ordered by Judge Richard L. Hodge on 02/01/2007. (Hodge, Richard)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
