Thomas v. Ammons et al
| Eugene Thomas |
| Thomas Ammons, Kevin Kinnel, Lt. Greene, Lt Norman, Officer St Jaques, Brigette V Jenkins and Officer Davenport |
| 1:2008cv00145 |
| November 5, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Mitchell |
| Richard L. Hodge |
| W. Louis Sands |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 44 Report and Recommendations.Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 9/14/10 (wks)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER adopting 6 Report and Recommendations dismissing Plaintiff's due process claim and Defendants Thomas Ammons, Kevin Kinnel, Lt. Greene, Lt. Norman, Officer St. Jaques and Officer Davenport.Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 9/30/09 (bjl)
|
|
Filing
25
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to deny re 13 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Officer Bridgett V. Jenkins. filed by Eugene Thomas, 12 to grant MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Brigette V Jenkins, Thomas Ammons Ordered by U.S. Mag. Judge Richard L. Hodge on 7/31/2009. (msd)
|
|
Filing
6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 2 Complaint filed by Eugene Thomas Objections to R&R due by 11/28/2008. Ordered by U.S. Mag. Judge Richard L. Hodge on 11/05/2008. (RLH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
