Brown v. Norton
Plaintiff: Robert Lee Brown
Defendant: John B Norton
Case Number: 1:2009cv00059
Filed: April 15, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Prisoner: Prison Condition Office
County: Mitchell
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Hodge
Presiding Judge: W. Louis Sands
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER granting 32 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 42 Report and Recommendations.Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 3/8/12 (wks)
March 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER FOR RESPONSE to Motion re: 32 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by John B. Norton. Ordered by U.S. Mag Judge Charles H. Weigle on 3/21/2011. (mgb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Norton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Lee Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John B Norton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?