Strang v. THE CITY OF ALBANY, GEORGIA et al
Kathleen Strang |
ALBANY GEORGIA, WILLIE ADAMS, Dorothy Hubbard, CHRISTOPHER PIKE, ROGER MARIETTA, BOB LANGSTAFF, Tommie Postell, Alfred Lott, C NATHAN DAVIS and MELANIE SLATON |
1:2012cv00072 |
May 10, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
Albany Office |
Dougherty |
W. Louis Sands |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 144 ORDER granting 109 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE LESLIE J ABRAMS on 3/8/2017. (bcl) |
Filing 77 ORDER denying 70 Motion to Dismiss. Ordered by U.S. District Judge W LOUIS SANDS on 4/22/2014. (bcl) |
Filing 69 ORDER granting 67 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by U.S. District Judge W. Louis Sands on 11/14/2013. (bcl) |
Filing 66 ORDER granting 37 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The case shall proceed on the following claims: First Amendment retaliation against Lott and the City of Albany arising from Strangs termination; First Amendment retaliation against Davis from retaliatory acts other than termination; Race discrimination from disparate treatment under 42 U.S.C § 1983 against Lott and the City of Albany; Race discrimination from a hostile work environment under § 1983 against Davis. The rest of the claims and related defendants are Dismissed. Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 9/12/2013. (bcl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.