WOOD v. CORDELE GEORGIA
Plaintiff: JACK M WOOD
Defendant: CORDELE GEORGIA
Case Number: 1:2013cv00011
Filed: January 23, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Albany Office
County: Crisp
Presiding Judge: W. Louis Sands
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint; denying as moot 22 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages.Ordered by U.S. District Judge W. Louis Sands on 11/6/13 (wks)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WOOD v. CORDELE GEORGIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CORDELE GEORGIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JACK M WOOD
Represented By: Michael A. Caldwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?