CASTLEBERRY v. RIDGEVIEW PRIVATE MENTAL WARD et al
DANIEL CASTLEBERRY |
COBB GENERAL MEDICAL HOSPITAL, KAREN DARLENE CASTLEBERRY, GEORGIA REGIONAL COLUMBUS, SAN MARCOS TREATMENT CENTER, BRAWNERS PRIVATE MENTAL WARD, GEORGIA REGIONAL ATLANTA, RIDGEVIEW PRIVATE MENTAL WARD, INNER HARBOUR PRIVATE MENTAL WARD, GEORGIA REGIONAL ROME, CITY AUSTELL KIDS ONLY DOWNTOWN MENTAL WARD and GMHI |
1:2018cv00134 |
July 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
Albany Office |
Sumter |
THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
W LOUIS SANDS |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to DANIEL CASTLEBERRY (bcl) |
Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (bcl) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Court to Order U.S. Marshals to Find Out Current Addresses of Defendants Filed by DANIEL CASTLEBERRY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(bcl) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Diversity Jurisdiction Filed by DANIEL CASTLEBERRY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(bcl) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by DANIEL CASTLEBERRY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(bcl) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by DANIEL CASTLEBERRY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.