COVIN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
| SHEDRICK NYKITA COVIN |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE) |
| 1:2018cv00144 |
| August 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Albany Office |
| Dougherty |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| W LOUIS SANDS |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 USM 285 Process Receipt and Return MAILED for SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, US Attorney & Attorney General. (bcl) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, U.S. ATTORNEY & ATTORNEY GENERAL. (bcl) |
| Filing 6 USM 285 Process Receipt and Return ISSUED for SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, U.S. ATTORNEY & ATTORNEY GENERAL. (bcl) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 8/30/2018. (asb)
|
| Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to SHEDRICK NYKITA COVIN. (bcl) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (bcl)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by SHEDRICK NYKITA COVIN.. Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(bcl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, filed by SHEDRICK NYKITA COVIN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
