JONES v. L AND R WILSON LLC, et al
| EMORY JONES |
| JUSTIN WILSON and L AND R WILSON LLC |
| 1:2019cv00024 |
| February 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| W LOUIS SANDS |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to EMORY JONES (ggs) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to JUSTIN WILSON. (ggs) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to L AND R WILSON LLC. (ggs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by EMORY JONES Fee paid: Receipt # 113G-3077782, $400 filed by Emory Jones (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Consent to Join, #3 Summons L and R Wilson, LLC, #4 Summons Justin Wilson )(MORGAN, CHARLES) Modified on 2/4/2019 to edit docket text. (ggs). |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint, filed by Emory Jones ); Parties were added using punctuation AND/OR title capitalization. The case opening guide states ***REMINDER*** all parties must be added using ALL CAPS (ie LISA SMITH or DELTA AIRLINES). Do not use ANY punctuation when adding new parties. For instructions on adding parties, please refer to the Style Guide located on the website for the Middle District of Georgia. NO NEED TO REFILE, corrections made by case manager. (ggs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
