DAVIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
| ALONZO K DAVIS |
| COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE) |
| 1:2019cv00047 |
| March 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 USM 285 Process Receipt and Return MAILED for COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General.(mdm) |
| Filing 7 USM 285 Process Receipt and Return ISSUED for COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (mdm) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (mdm) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 6/27/2019. (bmb)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (mdm)
|
| Filing 3 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to ALONZO K DAVIS (mdm) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by ALONZO K DAVIS.Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(mdm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY filed by ALONZO K DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Various Case Related Documents)(mdm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
