MCQURTER v. BRADFORD et al
THOMAS H MCQURTER |
MR BRADFORD, UNIT MANAGER ALLES, DR WOODS, MRS HENDRICKS, DEPUTY WARDEN SHAFFER, WARDEN BERRY, ATLANTA MED CENTER and AUGUSTA MEDICAL STATE PRISON |
1:2019cv00112 |
July 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by THOMAS H MCQURTER. (Attachments: #1 Trust Account Statement, #2 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(bcl) |
Filing 6 RECAST #1 Complaint against BRADFORD, HENDRICKS, WOODS, BERRY, SHAFFER, ATLANTA MED CENTER, AUGUSTA MEDICAL STATE PRISON by THOMAS H MCQURTER (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bcl) |
Filing 5 ORDER for Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or seek to proceed IFP, and to Recast his Complaint using the Court's standard form. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 7/30/2019. (TQL) |
Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint against All Defendants by THOMAS H MCQURTER (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bcl) |
Filing 3 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to THOMAS H MCQURTER. (bcl) |
Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (bcl) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by THOMAS H MCQURTER (Attachments: #1 Grievance Form, #2 Envelope)(bcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.