ELLIS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff: Nicole P. Ellis and NICOLE P ELLIS
Defendant: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Case Number: 1:2019cv00145
Filed: August 28, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2617
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2019 Filing 8 This is a text only entry; no document issued. The Motion is permissible under Local Rule 6.1. ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER on 10/24/2019
October 24, 2019 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.(STOFF, KATHERINE)
October 22, 2019 Filing 6 CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint. by GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS filed by KATHERINE POWERS STOFF. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Defendant's Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint)(STOFF, KATHERINE)
October 16, 2019 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by NICOLE P ELLIS (SCOTT, ROBERT)
September 3, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. (bcl)
August 30, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE Civil Cover Sheet by NICOLE P ELLIS (SCOTT, ROBERT)
August 29, 2019 Filing 2 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to NICOLE P ELLIS (mdm)
August 29, 2019 Notice of Deficiency - Attorney Case Opening: Parties were added using punctuation AND/OR title capitalization. The case opening guide states ***REMINDER*** all parties must be added using ALL CAPS (ie LISA SMITH or DELTA AIRLINES). Do not use ANY punctuation when adding new parties. Do not add addresses for the parties. When docketing the Complaint, a Civil Cover Sheet and a Summons should have been added as attachments. Please prepare and file the Civil Cover Sheet in CM/ECF. Please prepare and email the Summons to albany.ecf@gamd.uscourts.gov for issuance. For instructions on future case openings, please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide located on our website. NO NEED TO REFILE. (mdm)
August 28, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3248817, $400 filed by Nicole P. Ellis (SCOTT, ROBERT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ELLIS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: KATHERINE POWERS STOFF
Represented By: BRYAN K WEBB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole P. Ellis
Represented By: ROBERT MARION SCOTT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NICOLE P ELLIS
Represented By: ROBERT MARION SCOTT
Represented By: JOHN CLINT WALLACE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?