COX v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
| MARY NELL COX |
| AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 1:2019cv00166 |
| September 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SCHEDULING/DISCOVERY ORDER:Discovery to be complete by 5/5/2020. Dispositive motions due by 6/4/2020. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER on 11/12/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(bcl) |
| Filing 6 RULES 16/26 ORDER:Proposed Scheduling/Discovery order due by 11/7/2019. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER on 10/7/2019. (Attachments: #1 Required Form)(far) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY identifying Corporate Parent Home-Owners Insurance Company, Corporate Parent PROPERTY-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Corporate Parent Southern-Owners Insurance Company, Corporate Parent AUTO-OWNERS LIFE INSURANCE for AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY. (DIETRICHS, MARK) |
| Filing 4 Jurisdictional Statement by AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY (DIETRICHS, MARK) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY.(DIETRICHS, MARK) |
| Filing 2 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY. (bcl) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Notice of Removal, filed by AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY ); For future reference, all documents must be filed to include a description of exhibit(s), and the Superior Court information should be added when the case is opened. Additionally, the Answer needs to be filed as a separate document with the District Court case number. Please refile the answer. (bcl) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Notice of Removal, filed by AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY ); Pursuant to Local Rule 87.1, all nongovernmental corporate parties must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement. Please file the required corporate disclosures immediatelyPursuant to Local Rule 87.2 a Jurisdictional Statement must be filed. (bcl) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3272920, $400 filed by AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Answer to Complaint, #5 Certificate of Service Certificate of Filing)(DIETRICHS, MARK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: COX v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MARY NELL COX | |
| Represented By: | ROBERT M BEAUCHAMP |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | MARK T DIETRICHS |
| Represented By: | SABRINA L ATKINS |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
