RIDLEY v. HANCOCK
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY |
SHERIFF BILLY HANCOCK |
1:2019cv00204 |
November 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (bcl) |
Filing 1 EMERGENCY PETITION for Writ of Mandamus Filed by EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(bcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: RIDLEY v. HANCOCK | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: SHERIFF BILLY HANCOCK | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.