NEW v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
| MELISSA HOPE NEW |
| COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE) |
| 1:2019cv00205 |
| November 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (mdm)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(mdm) |
| Filing 2 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to MELISSA HOPE NEW (mdm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW SAUL Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3315904, $400 filed by MELISSA HOPE NEW (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Atttorney Gen, #3 Summons Defendant, #4 Summons US Atty)(HOGAN, JOHN) |
| Notice of Deficiency - ATTORNEY CASE OPENING: Per page 22 of the Style Guide for E-filing, when the Commissioner of Social Security is a party to the case, you will use COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY which is already located in the ECF Database. Pursuant to FRCP 17b, this court has decided to omit the current appointees name on the docket. Please do not add the individuals name when adding this party during case opening. NO NEED TO REFILE. (mdm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
