LAW v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
WADE LAW |
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE) |
1:2020cv00189 |
September 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Letter from U.S. Attorneys Office regarding service of Complaint (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mdm) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (mdm) |
Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (mdm) |
Filing 2 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to WADE LAW. (mdm) |
Notice of Deficiency - Attorney Case Opening: Per Page 22 of the Style Guide for Electronic Filing - This party name is already located in the ECF Database under Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to FRCP 17b, this court has decided to omit the current appointees name on the docket. Please to not add the individuals name when adding this party during case opening. (mdm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3581840, $400 filed by WADE LAW (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(SULLIVAN, DAVID) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.