Oldaker v. GILES et al
| WILLIAM BARR, CHAD WOLF and THOMAS P GILES |
| YANIRA YESENIA OLDAKER |
| 1:2020cv00222 |
| November 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 This is a text only entry; no document issued.CASE TRANSFERRED TO Valdosta Pursuant to Local Rule 3.4 Statement. Ordered on 11/9/2020. (bcl) |
Filing 3
ORDER for Respondent to File Responsive Pleading re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Yanira Yesenia Oldaker. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 11-9-20. (jdl)
|
| Filing 2 EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Yanira Yesenia Oldaker filed by David N. Dreyer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits 1-5, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order, #3 Affidavit Declaration of David N. Dreyer). Motion(s) referred to STEPHEN HYLES.(Dreyer, David) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUSagainst WILLIAM BARR, THOMAS P GILES, CHAD WOLF Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3619095, $5 filed by Yanira Yesenia Oldaker (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Filing Sheet)(Dreyer, David) |
| Case Transferred Out - Divisional Transfer to Case # 7:20cv224 (bcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
