HARRIS et al v. HATTON et al
LORENZO HARRIS and ANNETTA ZACHERY |
SPECTRUM LOGISTICS, INC., SHORELINE LOGISTICS, CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD HATTON and SPECTRUM LOGISTICS INC |
1:2020cv00244 |
November 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
W LOUIS SANDS |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 This is a text only entry; no document issued.CASE TRANSFERRED TO Macon Pursuant to Local Rule 3.4 Statement. (bcl) |
Case Transferred Out - Divisional Transfer to Case # 5:20-cv-441 (bcl) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD HATTON, SHORELINE LOGISTICS, SPECTRUM LOGISTICS, INC. identifying Corporate Parent W.R. BERKLEY CORPORATION for CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; Corporate Parent SALTCHUK LOGISTICS LLC for SHORELINE LOGISTICS, SPECTRUM LOGISTICS, INC.. (CHENG, TINA) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against All Plaintiffs Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3634775, $400 filed by All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Coiver Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Exhibit Defendants' Answer, #4 Exhibit Declaration of Tina Cheng, #5 Exhibit Plaintiff's Demand Letter, #6 Exhibit Affidavit of Service - CCIC, #7 Exhibit Affidavit of Service - Spectrum, #8 Exhibit Affidavit of Service - Hatton, #9 Exhibit SOS Certificate of Acknowledgement)(CHENG, TINA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.