MAYS v. DAVIS
Plaintiff: Barbara C Mays
Defendant: Joseph M Davis
Case Number: 1:2021cv00033
Filed: February 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2021 Filing 7 SCHEDULING/DISCOVERY ORDER:Discovery to be complete by 9/13/2021. Dispositive motions due by 10/12/2021. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER on 03/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Scheduling & Discovery Order)(mdm)
March 18, 2021 Filing 6 RESPONSE filed by JOSEPH M DAVIS re #4 MOTION to Remand (WANGERIN, KEVIN)
March 1, 2021 Filing 5 RULES 16/26 ORDER:Proposed Scheduling/Discovery order due by 4/1/2021. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER on 3/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Required Form)(far)
March 1, 2021 Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #4 Motion to Remand filed by BARBARA C MAYS ); Per Page 7 of the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Filing, all electronically filed documents must include a signature block and must set forth the filers name, address, telephone number and e-mail address. Document does NOT have to be refiled.(mdm)
February 26, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION to Remand by BARBARA C MAYS filed by JOHN C COTTON. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Brief, #2 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service)(COTTON, JOHN)
February 18, 2021 Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Notice of Removal filed by JOSEPH M DAVIS ); Document does NOT have to be refiled, but all future filings must be converted into a text-searchable PDF format prior to filing.(mdm)
February 18, 2021 Notice of Deficiency - Attorney Case Opening: Parties were added using punctuation AND/OR title capitalization. The case opening guide states ***REMINDER*** all parties must be added using ALL CAPS (ie LISA SMITH or DELTA AIRLINES). Do not use ANY punctuation when adding new parties. For instructions on adding parties, please refer to the Style Guide located on the website for the Middle District of Georgia. NO NEED TO REFILE. Pursuant to Local Rule 87.1, all nongovernmental corporate parties must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement. Therefore, #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by JOSEPH M DAVIS, was not necessary. (mdm)
February 17, 2021 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Joseph M Davis (WANGERIN, KEVIN)
February 17, 2021 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Joseph M Davis with Jury Demand.(WANGERIN, KEVIN)
February 17, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against All Plaintiffs Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3715487, $402 filed by Joseph M Davis (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Pleadings)(WANGERIN, KEVIN)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MAYS v. DAVIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph M Davis
Represented By: KEVIN A WANGERIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara C Mays
Represented By: JOHN C COTTON
Represented By: TIFFANY LYN DONOHUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?