MCCLENDON v. WARD
| JUSTICE SHUNTE MCCLENDON |
| TIMOTHY C WARD and H DWIGHT HAMRICK |
| 1:2021cv00140 |
| August 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| W LOUIS SANDS |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of filing Memorandum by JUSTICE SHUNTE MCCLENDON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dht) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against WARDEN by JUSTICE SHUNTE MCCLENDON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dht) |
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Service on correct Respondent. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 9/2/2021. (TQL)
|
| Filing 4 Letter from Meghan Hill to the Court regarding service. (bcl) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Service, and providing for amendment, and ORDER for Respondent to File Responsive Pleading re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by JUSTICE SHUNTE MCCLENDON. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 8/25/2021. (TQL)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (dht)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS against TIMOTHY C WARD filed by JUSTICE SHUNTE MCCLENDON. Filing fee paid receipt #42728. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Envelope)(dht) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
