WEAVER v. MITCHELL COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
| EDWARD WEAVER |
| MITCHELL COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, INVESTIGATOR EDWARD CONNELL and OFFICER DUSTY BROOKS |
| 1:2021cv00145 |
| August 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by EDWARD WEAVER. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(mdm) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against DUSTY BROOKS, EDWARD CONNELL, MITCHELL COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT,filed by EDWARD WEAVER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mdm) |
| Filing 4 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS,filed by EDWARD WEAVER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mdm) |
Filing 3
ORDER for Plaintiff/Petitioner to Recast his Complaint or Petition using the appropriate form, and to either pay the appropriate filing fee or seek to proceed IFP. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 8/23/2021. (TQL)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (mdm)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUSagainst DUSTY BROOKS, EDWARD CONNELL, MITCHELL COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT filed by EDWARD WEAVER (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mdm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
