STONE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
| ANNA MARIE STONE |
| COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE) |
| 1:2021cv00221 |
| December 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #4 USM285 Process Receipt and Return filed by ANNA MARIE STONE ); Wrong event used. Please do not re-file, corrected by case manager. The correct event is Certificate of Service.(mdm) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Service for COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit certified mail return receipts)(HOGAN, JOHN) Modified on 1/4/2022 to edit docket text.(mdm) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, U.S. ATTORNEY & ATTORNEY GENERAL (bcl) |
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (bcl)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3968069, $402 filed by ANNA MARIE STONE (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons US Atty, #3 Summons Atty Gen, #4 Summons DEFENDANT)(HOGAN, JOHN) Modified on 12/13/2021 to update text (bcl). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
