MAHONE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
| CIA D MAHONE |
| COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE) and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE) |
| 1:2022cv00038 |
| April 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of HHS Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. The Commissioner's Answer is due June 30, 2022. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 5/27/2022. (asb) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY filed by BARBARA G PARKER.. Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(PARKER, BARBARA) |
| Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to CIA D MAHONE (bcl) |
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (bcl)
|
| Filing 2 Local Rule 9.2 Social Security Identification Form by CIA D MAHONE (MORTON, DARYL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CIA D MAHONE Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4055438, $402 filed by CIA D MAHONE (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(MORTON, DARYL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
