ROBINSON v. WINHEIM et al
| TITUS ROBINSON |
| DAVID TITUS WINHEIM, LEWIS LAMB, ERIC BRYANT, LT LAKENDRA WAKEFIELD and GORDON BROWN |
| 1:2022cv00133 |
| August 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned - #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by TITUS ROBINSON, #1 Complaint filed by TITUS ROBINSON sent to Titus Robinson returned as undeliverable. (ksl) |
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by TITUS ROBINSON, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by TITUS ROBINSON. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 09/23/2022. (mlb) |
| Filing 4 Mail Returned - #3 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge sent to Titus Robinson returned as undeliverable. (bcl) |
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (bcl)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by TITUS ROBINSON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(bcl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by TITUS ROBINSON (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(bcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
