BROOMFIELD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
CLAUDE BROOMFIELD |
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE) and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE) |
1:2022cv00134 |
August 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. All parties having consented pursuant to 28 USC 636(c)(1) for a full-time U.S. Magistrate Judge to conduct any and all proceedings in connection with this action, including but not limited to, the trial of said case and the ordering of the entry of judgment herein; this case is hereby reassigned to US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF for all further proceedings. (bcl) |
Filing 5 Consent to proceed before a full-time U.S. Magistrate Judge in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in 28 U.S.C 636(c)(1) and (2) (BUDDE, FRANCIS) |
Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to CLAUDE BROOMFIELD (tam) |
|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4170350, $402 filed by CLAUDE BROOMFIELD (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Attorney General, #4 Summons Regional Chief Counsel, #5 Summons U.S. Attorney)(BUDDE, FRANCIS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.