THOMAS v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC.
| ANTONIO THOMAS |
| TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC. and TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC |
| 1:2022cv00153 |
| October 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CONSENT MOTION for Protective Order by TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC filed by SANJAY GHOSH. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (Exhibit A))(GHOSH, SANJAY) |
| Filing 7 SCHEDULING/DISCOVERY ORDER:Discovery to be complete by 5/3/2023. Dispositive motions due by 6/2/2023. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER on 11/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Scheduling & Dscovery Order)(mdm) |
| Filing 6 SCHEDULING/DISCOVERY ORDER:Discovery to be complete by 5/3/2023. Dispositive motions due by 6/2/2023. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER on 11/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(dht) |
| SECOND Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): Notice of Deficiency, ); Notice to Counsel - Eldridge Suggs, IV and Robbin Shipp: The e mail addresses on the document does not match your e mail addresses in CM/ECF. A Notice of Deficiency may be entered if the document requires leave of court or other follow-up action is required. Participants are expected to make corrections within 2 business days of receiving the Notice of Deficiency. If corrections are not made in a timely manner, the matter will be referred to chambers and may result in an Order to Show Cause. See Page 13 of the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Filing.(mdm) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal, by TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC with Jury Demand.(GHOSH, SANJAY) |
| Filing 4 RULES 16/26 ORDER:Proposed Scheduling/Discovery order due by 11/7/2022. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER on 10/6/2022. (Attachments: #1 Required Form)(fad) |
| Filing 3 Jurisdictional Statement by TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC (GHOSH, SANJAY) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Notice of Removal, filed by TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC ); Parties were added using punctuation AND/OR title capitalization. The attorney case opening guide states ***REMINDER*** all parties must be added using ALL CAPS (ie LISA SMITH or DELTA AIRLINES). Do not use ANY punctuation when adding new parties. For instructions on adding parties, please refer to the Style Guide located on the website for the Middle District of Georgia. Please do not re-file, corrected by case managerIn diversity cases, a Jurisdictional Statement must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties. Please file the required statement immediately. See Local Rule 87.2.(mdm) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Notice of Removal, filed by TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC ); Notice to Counsel - Eldridge Suggs, IV and Robbin Shipp: The e mail address on the document does not match your e mail address in CM/ECF. If necessary, please update your e mail address via PACER.(mdm) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC. (GHOSH, SANJAY) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against ANTONIO THOMAS Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4199073, $402 filed by TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Turner County Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) All parties must refile pending motions from the court of origin in this new case.(GHOSH, SANJAY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
