TUCKER v. JCB TRANSPORTATION, INC et al
| JASON TUCKER |
| JCB TRANSPORTATION INC and JAMES BYNUM |
| 1:2022cv00201 |
| December 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 704 Labor Litigation |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by JCB TRANSPORTATION INC (WILLCOX, C) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by JCB TRANSPORTATION INC with Jury Demand.(WILLCOX, C) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by JAMES BYNUM with Jury Demand.(WILLCOX, C) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by C JASON WILLCOX on behalf of JAMES BYNUM, JCB TRANSPORTATION INC Attorney C JASON WILLCOX added to party JAMES BYNUM(pty:dft), Attorney C JASON WILLCOX added to party JCB TRANSPORTATION INC(pty:dft)(WILLCOX, C) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to JAMES BYNUM & JCB TRANSPORTATION INC. (Attachments: #1 Summons JCB Transporation Inc)(mdm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JAMES BYNUM, JCB TRANSPORTATION, INC Fee paid: Receipt # BGAMDC-4241987, $402 filed by JASON TUCKER (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Consent to Sue, #3 Summons Proposed Summons James Bynum, #4 Summons Proposed Summons JCB Transportation, Inc)(ORLANDO, ROGER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
