CRITTENDEN v. BAKER COUNTY GA et al
| QUANONA CRITTENDEN |
| BAKER COUNTY GA and DANA MEADE |
| 1:2023cv00039 |
| March 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| W LOUIS SANDS |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by BAKER COUNTY GA, DANA MEADE with Jury Demand.(ROLLINS, RALEIGH) |
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgment filed by BAKER COUNTY GA, DANA MEADE. (ROLLINS, RALEIGH) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Corrected Civil Cover Sheet by QUANONA CRITTENDEN re Notice of Deficiency, #1 Complaint, (BROOKHUIS, AMANDA) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to BAKER COUNTY GA, DANA MEADE. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(mdm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BAKER COUNTY GA, DANA MEADE IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SHERIFF OF BAKER COUNTY GA Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4316299, $402 filed by QUANONA CRITTENDEN (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Baker County Summons, #3 Summons Sheriff Dana Meade Summons, #4 Exhibit EEOC DNRTS)(BROOKHUIS, AMANDA) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint, filed by QUANONA CRITTENDEN ); Other: Civil Cover Sheet does not reflect the correct parties of this case. Please file the corrected Civil Cover Sheet by using event Notice (Other).(mdm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
