SHAH et al v. BLINKEN et al
| DIPAL SHAH and PURVIKABAHEN DIPAL SHAH |
| ANTONY J BLINKEN, JULIE STUFFT and PEGGY PETROVICH |
| 1:2023cv00058 |
| April 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by DIPAL SHAH, PURVIKABAHEN DIPAL SHAH as to All Defendants. (DIAZ, LESLIE) |
| Filing 3 Letter regarding improper service of complaint. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bcl) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to ANTONY J BLINKEN, PEGGY PETROVICH, JULIE STUFFT, U.S. Attorney and Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(bcl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4345808, $402 filed by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A: Interview appointment notice, #3 Exhibit B: First refusal notice, #4 Exhibit C: First receipt additional evidence, #5 Exhibit D: Second refusal notice, #6 Exhibit E: Second receipt additional evidence, #7 Summons Summons Antony Blinken, #8 Summons Summons Julie Stufft, #9 Summons Summons Peggy Petrovich, #10 Summons Summons Attorney General, #11 Summons Summons US Attorney)(DIAZ, LESLIE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
