PATEL et al v. MAYORKAS et al
| MINALBHAI BALDEVBHAI PATEL, VANITABEN MINALBHAI PATEL and YASHKUMAR MINALBHAI PATEL |
| ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DANIEL M RENAUD, MERRICK GARLAND and TRACY RENAUD |
| 1:2023cv00142 |
| August 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DANIEL M RENAUD, TRACY RENAUD, & US ATTORNEY (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(bcl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4441304, $402 filed by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons for Alejandro Mayorkas, #3 Summons Summon for Daniel M. Renaud, #4 Summons Summons for Merrick Garland, #5 Summons Summons for Tracy Renaud, #6 Summons Summons for U.S. Attorney MDGA, #7 Exhibit I-918 Receipt Notice, #8 Exhibit I-918A Receipt Notice, #9 Exhibit I-918A Receipt Notice, #10 Exhibit USCIS POLICY MANUAL BFD EAD, #11 Exhibit I-765 Receipt Notice, #12 Exhibit I-765 Receipt Notice, #13 Exhibit I-765 Receipt Notice, #14 Exhibit I-918 Biometrics Notice, #15 Exhibit I-918A Biometrics Notice, #16 Exhibit I-918A Biometrics Notice)(CHAUDHARY, BHAVYA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
