SULLIVAN v. WARD et al
Plaintiff: MARIO ROMOAN SULLIVAN
Defendant: COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WARDEN WALTER BARRY, WARDEN DARRIN MYERS, DR MARK A WOODS and JOHN OR JANE DOE
Case Number: 1:2024cv00012
Filed: January 22, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER
Referring Judge: THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2024 Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, filed by MARIO ROMOAN SULLIVAN; ORDER denying as moot #2 Motion ; denying as moot #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying as moot #5 Motion. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 3/7/2024. (asb)
February 12, 2024 Filing 5 MOTION for Substitution Filed by MARIO ROMOAN SULLIVAN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(bcl)
January 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (bcl)
January 22, 2024 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel Filed by MARIO ROMOAN SULLIVAN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(bcl)
January 22, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION to Add Plaintiff Parties as Class Action Suit Filed by MARIO ROMOAN SULLIVAN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(bcl)
January 22, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by MARIO ROMOAN SULLIVAN (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Summons, #3 Declaration of Plaintiff, #4 Proposed Order, #5 Medical & Water Info, #6 Envelope)(bcl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SULLIVAN v. WARD et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARIO ROMOAN SULLIVAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WARDEN WALTER BARRY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WARDEN DARRIN MYERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DR MARK A WOODS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN OR JANE DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?