PATEL et al v. JADDOU
| TUSHAR Kaushikkumar PATEL and POOJA Rakeshkumar PATEL |
| UR MENDOZA JADDOU |
| 1:2024cv00013 |
| January 24, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by DANIEL SCHUTRUM-BOWARD on behalf of All Defendants Attorney DANIEL SCHUTRUM-BOWARD added to party UR MENDOZA JADDOU(pty:dft)(SCHUTRUM-BOWARD, DANIEL) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by TUSHAR KAUSHIKKUMAR PATEL as to UR MENDOZA JADDOU. (ALWAN, ZAINAB) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to UR MENDOZA JADDOU, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(mdm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UR MENDOZA JADDOU Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4551919, $405 filed by TUSHAR Kaushikkumar PATEL (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receipt Notice for Plaintiff Tushar Kaushikkumar Patels Form I-918, #2 Exhibit Receipt Notice for Derivative Plaintiff Pooja Rakeshkumar Patels Form I-918A, #3 Exhibit USCIS.gov case processing times printout, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons Summons Attorney General, #6 Summons Summons Peter D. Leary, #7 Summons Summons Ur Mendoza Jaddou)(ALWAN, ZAINAB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
