HARDRICK v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al
| EDRICK HARDRICK |
| NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE, NAVY FEDERAL INVESTMENT SERVICES LLC, EDWARD R COCHRANE, CAPT NEIL W T HOGG, RDML ANNIE B ANDREWS, MARY A MCDUFFIE, RDML BRIAN E LUTHER, RDML KIRK A FOSTER, DIANE M RANDON, COL JENNIFER E SHAAR, COL MARK R TAYLOR, BRIG GEN MICHAEL C WHOLLEY, BRIG GEN JOHN R EDWARDS, CAPT JALA J E MARSHALL and CAPT PATRICK J MCCLANAHAN |
| 1:2024cv00018 |
| January 31, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
| Truth in Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by EDRICK HARDRICK. (Attachments: #1 AO 240 Form, #2 Envelope)(bcl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by EDRICK HARDRICK (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Annual Report 2022, #3 Exhibit 2 - Georgia UCC Search Report 10/25/23, #4 Exhibit 3 - Legal Information Institute Contract Definition, #5 Exhibit 4 - Legal Information Institute Contract Definition, #6 Exhibit 5 - CFPB Complaint, #7 Envelope)(bcl) |
| REMARK: Documents 1 and 2 are very difficult to read. Originals are on file in the Clerk's Office. (bcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
