JONES v. ODOM
| EMORY T. JONES |
| WARDEN ROY ODUM |
| 1:2024cv00099 |
| July 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by MEGHAN H HILL on behalf of ROY ODUM Attorney MEGHAN H HILL added to party ROY ODUM(pty:res)(HILL, MEGHAN) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by MICHAEL OLDHAM on behalf of ROY ODUM Attorney MICHAEL OLDHAM added to party ROY ODUM(pty:res)(OLDHAM, MICHAEL) |
Filing 8
ORDER providing for amendment, and Directing Service, and ORDER for Respondent to File Responsive Pleading re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by EMORY T. JONES. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 8/15/2024. (TQL)
|
| Filing fee Paid: Habeas $5. Receipt No. 500007367 (elp) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner is Ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $5.00. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 7/24/2024 (TQL)
|
| MOTION(S) REFERRED: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to US Magistrate Judge.. Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(mdm) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Langstaff issued at the direction of the Court (tlf).
|
| Filing 5 Case transferred in District Transfer from District of Georgia Southern; Case Number 4:24-cv-00134. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. **The Notice of Electronic Filing serves as certification for these transferred documents.** |
|
Filing 4
ORDER transferring case to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 7/3/2024. (maa) [Transferred from gasd on 7/3/2024.]
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 7/15/2024.) (jlh) [Transferred from gasd on 7/3/2024.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Emory T. Jones. Responses due by 7/15/2024. (Attachment: #1 Inmate Account Statement.) REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray. (jlh) [Transferred from gasd on 7/3/2024.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Emory T. Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit.) (jlh) [Transferred from gasd on 7/3/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JONES v. ODOM | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN ROY ODUM | |
| Represented By: | MICHAEL OLDHAM |
| Represented By: | MEGHAN H HILL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: EMORY T. JONES | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
